What is a characteristic of conventional alignment methods compared to laser alignment?

Conventional alignment methods typically require a lower initial investment compared to laser alignment systems. This is primarily due to the simpler equipment and tools used in conventional techniques, such as straight edges, dial indicators, and feeler gauges, which are considerably less expensive than the high-tech components involved in laser alignment systems. Although conventional alignment may not provide the same levels of precision or ease of use that laser systems offer, it is a viable choice for many applications, particularly when cost is a significant factor for the operation or project.

The other methods, while they may have their benefits in accuracy or adaptability, usually entail higher costs for initial setup and investment than conventional tools and techniques. Understanding the economics of alignment methods is crucial for millwrights and technicians when selecting the appropriate alignment strategy for their specific situation.